|
The objectives of
the MZTRA farm in establishing the existing crop rotation are to:
1.
Reduce energy use, including N fertilizer, by 30%.
2.
Reduce pesticide dependence by 50%.
3.
Maintain or increase production.
4.
Decrease our dependence on glyphosate as the basis for successful
zero-tillage.
5.
Reduce the need for chemical control of wild oats to 2 out of every
3 years.
6.
Develop a system that works in all years, regardless of moisture
conditions.
7.
Develop a system that is economically sound and includes provisions
for livestock.
8.
Just as we moved from the mechanical to the chemical age, now move
to the cultural age, using the best of the knowledge we
have learned from the past.
The following protocol has been
drafted with the goal of addressing these objectives.
The goal of the protocol is
to be consistent over time in order to be able to identify
differences between rotations, and to accommodate flexibility
in specific management practices.
The protocol will be reviewed
annually in the event that measurable changes in recommendations
of management practices occur, and may be revised if necessary.
For all field operations, detailed
information will be recorded into a consistent template.
Field operations will be conducted
using MZTRA equipment; however custom applicators may be
used if the MZTRA cannot accomplish the operation due to
time or equipment limitations.
Daily time sheets will be maintained
to track efficiency of various farm operations.
Table of Contents:
INTRODUCTION
1
GENERAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH
3
SEEDING
4
WEED CONTROL
6
FERTILITY MANAGEMENT
8
DISEASE AND INSECT MANAGEMENT
11
HARVEST MANAGEMENT
12
PASTURE MANAGEMENT
13
CATTLE MANAGEMENT
14
TERMINATION MANAGEMENT FOR FORAGE STANDS 15
CROP ROTATIONS
16
APPENDIX
17
- Management decisions
are made with the stated objectives of MZTRA in mind.
- A consistent approach to management
is used on a year-to-year basis, with changes made only
to correct observed problems/deficiencies in the existing
management system.
- Disease, weed and pest control
is achieved through integrated pest management. Decisions
to apply pesticides are based on field scouting.
- Fertilization to be based on results
of soil test analysis along with yield goals determined
from area/MZTRA farm long term average yields. Tissue testing may be used
if it can be incorporated into a funded agronomic project.
**Replicates within each treatments are
managed the same for all operations in order to maintain the
integrity of the study (e.g. seeding, fertility, pest control,
harvest)
Crop
Species
Selection of crop species (e.g.
spring and winter cereals) will be based on:
- long term crop rotation set by
board of directors
- agronomic considerations (e.g.
pea/flax or barley/wheat)
- economic considerations (e.g.
pea/flax or barley/wheat)
Cultivar
Selection
of cultivars will be based on:
- local suitability (days to maturity, disease resistance,
yield potential, quality)
-
competitiveness with weeds
-
market opportunities
-
Seed Manitoba recommendations
-
producer input regarding price, availability, agronomic
characteristics
Seed
source
- certified seed
whenever possible
Seed treatments
- use seed treatments if conditions such as early
seeding, cool spring soil temperatures or high pest pressures
are expected, unless directed by research committee.
| Crop |
Product Options |
| Winter
cereal
-Winter wheat |
-dependent
on availability, price and effectiveness |
| Spring
cereals
-Wheat
-Barley
-Oats
-Rye
-Triticale |
-dependent
on availability, price and effectiveness |
| Oilseeds
-canola*
-flax |
-dependent
on availability, price and effectiveness |
| Pulses
-peas |
-dependent
on availability, price and effectiveness |
| Forages
-legumes |
-dependent
on availability, price and effectiveness |
*post-emergent flea
beetle control as a rescue operation, if required
Inoculation
- inoculate all legume
crops.
| Crop |
Yes/No |
Product Options |
| Pulses
-peas |
yes |
recommended
Rhizobium at recommended rate
-form dependant
on availability, price and effectiveness |
| Forages
-legumes |
yes |
recommended
Rhizobium at recommended rate
-form dependant
on availability, price and effectiveness |
Seeding rates / dates
- target the higher range of the goal plant stand
when determining seeding rate, as better weed competition
and even crop maturity result from increased seeding rates.
- update seeding
rate and seeding date recommendations based on current information.
Annual crops:
| Crop |
Goal plant stand (plant / ft2) |
Goal seeding date |
| Winter
cereal
-Winter wheat |
20-30 |
September 1-15 |
| Spring
cereals
-Wheat
-Barley
-Oats
-Rye
-Triticale |
23-28
22-25
18-23
24
24-30 |
May 1-10 |
| Oilseeds
-canola/alfalfa*
-canola
-flax |
7-11
7-11
37-56 |
May 10-15 |
| Pulses
-peas |
5-8 |
April 25-May 5 |
Reference:
Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives, Field
Crop Production Guide.
Alfalfa: Will be sown at 8-10 lbs/ac. Recommended seeding
rates for forages are provided by Manitoba Agriculture,
Food and Rural Initiatives at http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/forages
*Forages are under-seeded
with canola during the year of establishment, with Clearfield
canola seeded at a reduced rate.
*Early spring seeding
of forages is preferred.
Seeding depth
- seed as shallowly
as possible into moisture
Seeding equipment
- Morris air drill
WEED CONTROL:
**Weed
control decisions are based on weed populations in each
field**
Field scouting (for decisions regarding burn-off and in-crop
herbicide applications):
Field scout to estimate
overall weed densities
- Select 5 - 1m2 areas
in each individual field at random. Areas selected should
be representative of the field in terms of weed numbers,
and uniformly spaced across the entire field avoiding
field edges, low spots and weed patches.
- Count and record the number of
grassy weeds and the number of broadleaf weeds in each
1m2 area.
- Calculate the field average for
each rep of a given treatment.
- Apply grassy and/or broadleaf herbicide
only if weed densities warrant application. (Economic
thresholds for selected weeds are available in the Guide
to Crop Protection.)
Note:
If weed populations
warrant herbicide application in one of two reps of a given
treatment, both replicates must be sprayed, with the exception
of spot spraying weedy patches within the field.
A rescue operation
may be conducted if weed populations have the potential
to cause an economically significant reduction in crop yield
and/or quality.
Field scout to identify
weed patches, encroaching weeds, etc.
- Assess weed patches, low spots
and field borders separately from inside of field.
- Mark on a map any weed patches
(e.g. Canada thistle, quackgrass, wild oat) or weeds invading
from field edges.
- Use GPS to mark location of weed
patches.
- Monitor weed patches, etc.
- If warranted, spot spray weed patches.
Record scouting information into a consistent template.
Herbicide selection
- Where herbicide application is warranted based on the weed
densities present, select the least costly of the effective
products available if a significant price difference exists.
- Free products from sponsors will be used where available,
but not if it undermines the overall goals of the study.
- Apply recommended herbicides based on recommended rates
and crop stages. Where necessary, adjust herbicide rates,
based on weeds present, environmental conditions and development
stage as per recommendations.
- Rotate herbicides used to
avoid weed resistance.
- If a cost effective option
to glyphosate application is available, it will be considered.
Herbicide application
- Record information into a
consistent template.
Field boundary weed control
- Field boundary and fence line sanitation will be conducted
annually to prevent weed encroachment into the study area.
- Herbicide choice will be dependant
on weeds present.
Chaff collection
- MAFRI is responsible for weed scouting regarding chaff
collection study, and MZTRA is responsible for collection
of the chaff
- Chaff is collected from the west half of fields 103 and
203 using a Redekop chaff spreader. Chaff is spread on
the east half of these fields.
- Field divisions are marked with poles and GPS.
- Weed counts are done separately
for each half of these fields.
Soil Sampling Protocol
- Selected mid and upper slope sampling sites from the 83
site farm grid pattern will be used, in order to provide
a representative mid-slope sample (some grid locations may
be in sloughs, saline spots, knolls etc.) of each field.
- Each field will have 5 geo-referenced sites x 3 samples
per site and each sample separated by depth at 0-6",
6-12", 12-24".
- Sampling will be done in late
fall.
- Keep a small number of samples in long-term storage in
case there is additional analysis needed in the future.
Traditional Composite Random Sampling:
- Cores of each depth
(0-6", 6-12",
12-24") will
be taken throughout the field, thoroughly mixed, sub-sampled
and sent to the lab as a single sample for each depth.
- Sampling areas will
be representative of the field being sampled. For hilly
fields with knolls, slopes or depressions, samples will
be taken from mid-slope positions to get average results.
- Sampling in obvious
areas of unusual variability, such as saline areas, eroded
knolls, etc. will be avoided.
Reference: Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives, Manitoba Soil Fertility
Guide. http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/soilwater/soilfert
- Soil analysis will be conducted at the same lab
each year for consistency in analysis techniques. Norwest
will be used as the farm has sent samples there in the past.
The following procedures are used for the analysis of the
four major nutrients:
Nitrogen
(N) - Water
soluble nitrate-nitrogen measured to the 24 inch depth and
extracted with a weak calcium chloride solution.
Phosphorus
(P) - Modified Kelowna extract which technique measures extractable
P in the top 6 inch depth.
Potassium
(K) - Modified
Kelowna extract technique measures exchangeable K in the
top 6 inch depth.
Sulphur
(S) - Water
soluble sulphate-sulphur measured to the 24 inch depth and
extracted with a weak calcium chloride solution.
Reference: Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives, Manitoba Soil Fertility
Guide. http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/soilwater/soilfert;Norwest
Labs Schedule of Services. http://www.norwestlabs.com/newnorwestwebsite/who_we_are
Fertilization Criteria,
Products and Placement
Fertilization
criteria
- develop our own fertility recommendations, or
understand Norwest basis for their recommendations.
Nitrogen: soil test nitrate-N level in
each treatment; established goal N levels. In crops after
alfalfa, use MB Soil Fertility Guide to determine available
lbs/ac of N credit from alfalfa.
Phosphorus:
pre-set ranges of fertilizer P rates according to P removal
by crop
Potassium:
if required according to soil test
Sulphur: soil test sulphate-S level
in each treatment; established soil test S criteria. Sulphate-S
will be applied in the year of alfalfa establishment, even
though it may hinder the nitrogen fixation to some degree.
S will not be applied to cereals, as the high organic matter
content of the soils combined with the fact that canola
(which receives S) is grown in the rotation, likely means
that there would be no response to S fertilizer on cereals.
Test results may not be accurate for S, because of the presence
of gypsum in the farms soils. If the soil test indicates
adequate S when planning to grow canola, S will still be
applied, as the potential yield loss of canola from S deficiency
can be high. Tissue testing will be considered when a more
accurate analysis of sulphur levels in the soil is required.
Reference: Cynthia Grant, 2003
Fertilizer
sources, placement
- Phosphate is placed with the seed, while Nitrogen
and Sulphur are side banded.
- The following sources are the preference, however
other new or donated products will be considered.
- If other sources or placement methods are being
considered, factors such as potential impact on nutrient
loss (e.g. denitrification), and whether or not they have
the potential to be commonly practiced will be investigated.
N source: UAN solution (28-0-0)
P source: granular monoammonium phosphate (MAP), seed placed
Fertilizer rates
for each crop
- Estimated lbs/ac of
nutrient to achieve desired yield goals.
- Phosphate recommendation is based on placement with a view on seedling
safety; ex) to apply more Phosphate to peas, apply extra
in previous cereal crop.
| Crop |
Goal
N rate (soil + fertilizer N in lb/ac to 2’) |
Rate
of P2O5 (lb/ac) |
Rate
of S*
(lb/ac) |
| Winter
cereal
-Winter wheat |
|
35 |
0 |
| Spring
cereals
-Wheat
-Barley
-Oats
-Rye
-Triticale |
100
85 (malt)
100
100
100 |
35
35
35
35
35 |
0
0
0
0
0 |
| Oilseeds
-Canola/alfalfa
-Canola
-Flax** |
120
120
90 |
25-35
25
0 |
|
| Pulses
-Peas |
Inoculate
at recommended rate |
25 |
0 |
| Forage
legumes
-Grazed***
-Hayed*** |
Inoculate
at recommended rate |
Do not fertilize established alfalfa |
Do not fertilize established alfalfa |
* Sufficient S will be applied to canola in order
to have sufficient S recycling to support the other crops
in the rotation which will not receive sulphur.
** If flax is to be grown, apply more P fertilizer
in the previous season.
*** forage will not
be fertilized due to short term nature and the need to compare
soil fertility of hayed vs. grazed treatments
DISEASE AND INSECT MANAGEMENT:
**Decisions regarding
fungicide and insecticide application are based on the results
of field scouting and, where available, economic thresholds**
- Resource people (e.g. MAFRI, AAFC) can be consulted if
in doubt.
- Keep in mind what area farmers are doing when making
decisions.
- Disease forecasting tools (e.g. ACE) may be consulted
when making a decision.
HARVEST
MANAGEMENT:
Annual crops
* Yield of all crops is measured with both a yield monitor
and weigh wagon, which are used for every harvested load.
Care is used to avoid filling the weigh wagon to much, as
its accuracy goes down as the total weight measured per
load increases.
Harvest:
Cereals: preference is to straight-combine
whenever possible, swath and pick -up if necessary.
Residue management*:
- Consider harrowing as an option for residue management.
Cereals: preference is to chop and
spread straw however, bale if straw management or livestock
feed are issues.
Non-cereals: preference is to chop and
spread straw however, bale if straw management or livestock
feed are issues.
*note re: chaff collection
- Chaff is collected from the west half of fields 103 and
203 using a Redekop chaff blower. Chaff is spread on the
east half of these fields.
- Field divisions are marked with poles and GPS.
- Weed counts are done separately for each half of these
fields.
- In future, if straw is to be removed, chaff can be dropped
on the straw and baled.
Forage crops
- Preferred harvest method is to cut and bale.
- Goal is to take 2 cuts per year.
- Preferred crop stage at harvest: 10-15% bloom.
PASTURE
MANAGEMENT:
- Cattle graze on ½ of the forage acreage in each of the
2 alfalfa fields.
- The number of cattle is a function of the carrying capacity
of the pasture. Due to the short term nature of the forage
stand in the rotation, we will use a high stocking rate,
to be determined by the moisture outlook at the beginning
of each year. Stocking rates will be determined in consultation
with the Livestock Committee.
- 1/3 of the hay from the hayed fields will be held back
as insurance, so that there is feed available if the high
stocking rates cause a pasture shortage late in the season.
- If the animals do have to be fed hay, they will be moved
to the pasture north of the farmyard which is outside of
the study area.
- A rotational grazing system is used, with animals moved
from paddock to paddock based on the condition of the current
and upcoming paddocks. Animals will be rotated faster if
it is necessary to prevent the alfalfa from getting too
mature.
- Each field may be divided into 6 paddocks which will also
help in preventing the alfalfa from getting too mature.
- Information regarding pasture
management from MAF is available at:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/forages
- If fertilizer must be applied to the pasture,
it is applied to both the hayed and grazed pastures. In
the years after forage termination, the fields will be fertilized
according to soil test recommendations.
Cattle
Management:
- MZTRA will manage Ducks Unlimited cattle and in return
receive a portion of the revenue from those cattle.
- MZTRA and Ducks Unlimited Cattle will be from the same
source, and animals will be weighed individually coming
in and out of the pasture with a mobile scale.
- Shrink will be managed when cattle are being shipped
out in order for the custom grazing to be as profitable
as possible.
- Animals will be managed humanely and treated in the same manner that would
be considered common practice on a farm scale.
- When necessary, animals will be treated with a veterinarian
recommended medication.
- Animals will have access to clean drinking water through
a pasture pipeline system at all times.
- Animals will be fenced out of riparian areas, accessing
drinking water from troughs only.
-
Animals will have access to cattle oilers for fly control.
- Animals will receive free choice pasture mineral throughout
the season.
- Cattle may be leased or purchased, at the discretion
of the livestock committee and MZTRA board of directors.
- Cattle grazing alfalfa will be medicated with a bloat reduction product
delivered through the water system.
TERMINATION MANAGEMENT FOR FORAGE
STANDS:
Herbicide product / rate: based on timing
of application, stand condition, weeds present, cost, etc.
Timing of termination:
Terminate pasture before the cattle graze the paddocks on
the last rotation (spray each paddock 3 days before they
will be grazed for the last time). For the hayed field,
spray out 3-7 days before 2nd cut is hayed (use
the earlier period if leaf loss is a concern). If necessary,
use a second herbicide application prior to freeze up or
the following spring.
Crop Rotations at the MZTRA
Farm:
| Year |
Annual Rotation |
Livestock Rotation |
| 1 |
Canola |
Canola/Alfalfa |
| 2 |
Cereal |
Alfalfa |
| 3 |
Peas |
Alfalfa |
| 4 |
Canola |
Alfalfa/Winter Wheat |
| 5 |
Winter Wheat |
Winter Wheat |
| 6 |
Flax |
Flax |
| Year |
101 |
102 |
103 |
104 |
201 |
202 |
203 |
204 |
| 2001 |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola |
| 2002 / 2008 |
RSW |
wwheat |
wwheat |
Forage |
RSW |
wwheat |
wwheat |
Forage |
| 2003 |
Peas |
Flax |
Flax |
Forage |
Peas |
Flax |
Flax |
Forage |
| 2004 |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola / forage |
Forage/ wwheat |
Canola |
Canola |
Canola / forage |
Forage/wwheat |
| 2005 |
wwheat |
Cereal |
Forage |
wwheat |
wwheat |
Cereal |
Forage |
wwheat |
| 2006 |
Flax |
Peas |
Forage |
Flax |
Flax |
Peas |
Forage |
Peas |
| 2007 |
Canola |
Canola |
Forage/ wwheat |
Canola / forage |
Canola |
Canola |
Forage/wwheat |
Canola / forage |
| 2008 / 2002 |
Cereal |
wwheat |
wwheat |
Forage |
Cereal |
wwheat |
wwheat |
Forage |
- Green indicates annual rotation
- Note: Cereals are interchangeable
- 2001 was baseline a year (whole farm sown to canola) and is excluded
from the rotation.
- 100 and 200 fields are replicates and are to be managed the same every
year
- Both annual and livestock rotations have a “staggered start” in order
to have more comparison crops throughout the rotation.
- Comparison crops: 02-wwheat; 03-flax; 04-canola; 05-wwheat; 06-flax;
07-canola
APPENDIX
Reference
material:
Internet Sources:
Fertility
MB Soil Fertility Guide:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/ soilwater/soilfert/fbd02s00.html
Soil testing:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/soilwater/soilfert/fbd02s11.html
Field scouting
Scouting for weeds:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/fab01s00.html
Scouting for insects:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/insects/fad01s00.html
Scouting for disease:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/diseases/fac01s00.html
MB Field Scouting Guide:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/news/topics/daa35d03.html
AB Field Scouting Guide:
http://www.agric.gov.ab.ca/pests/60510600.html
Integrated weed management
General weed information:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/index.html
http://www.mandakzerotill.org/adart06.html
http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/DOCS/crops/integrated_ pest_management/weed_control/weedmgt.asp
Integrated insect management
General insect information:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/insects/index.html
http://www.mandakzerotill.org/iimindex.html
Disease management
General disease information:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/diseases/index.html
Rotation
General crop rotation information:
http://www.mandakzerotill.org/adart04.html
Personal reference:
Fertility
Personal contact. Grant, Cynthia, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,
2003.
Personal contact. Manitoba
Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives Specialists, 2003.
FARM
PROTOCOL
OBJECTIVES
OF CROP ROTATION
CROP
ROTATIONS |